To Start Our FREE Interview Training Course

Feb 11, 2017
by James

The Best (And Worst) Rated Interview Process According to Glassdoor 

Posted in Interview Process Excellence
We obsess over helping companies improve their job interview process.


In order to be good at this type of work, we have to study the companies who do it well — as well as the companies who do it poorly.


But how do you know which companies excel at delivering a great interview experience and which companies can’t seem to get it right?


Well, the obvious and best source of this type of information is to ask candidates.


And when it comes to obtaining public, real-time feedback of this type, there’s no better place to look than




In case you’re not aware, Glassdoor is a website aimed at “helping candidates find jobs at companies they love”.   And while this tagline sounds like it describes any generic job site, Glassdoor adds a layer of data to their site that makes it different than the Indeeds or Careerbuilders of the world.


This additional layer of information comes in the form of crowdsourced candidate and employee reviews.


Look up any company that you’re interested in and you can find a corporate overview, CEO ratings, candidate comments and employee salary data — all provided through the lens of someone who has experienced it first hand.


The great thing about this (for us anyway) is that the information is publicly available.   So companies who treat employees or candidates poorly can no longer hide.   It’s all there for the world to see.




As with any ratings and reviews site, you have to take the information with a grain of salt.   It’s more common for a disgruntled candidate to leave feedback than a happy candidate.   This can cause ratings and reviews to skew towards the negative.    This is compounded by the fact that the reviewers can choose to be anonymous.


All that said…every company is subject to the same rules on Glassdoor, so overall, it’s safe to analyze the data and compare companies against each other because they’re all using the same scorecard.


So that’s exactly what we did.




Taking the information that is publicly available on the site, we embarked on a research project aimed at obtaining a couple different pieces of information.


We wanted to know…


  1.  When it comes to candidate-generated interview ratings, who were the highest and lowest rated companies in the Fortune 1000?

2.   What are the candidate comments that emerged as themes in support of the high or low ratings?


The purpose of this study was to identify some insights about what the best companies do and what the worst companies do — so we can help our clients do less of the bad stuff and more of the good stuff   🙂




Our study was fairly simple.  We took 3 key interview data points that were publicly available on the site and we plugged them into a spreadsheet.    We focused only on Fortune 1000 companies because they had a larger number of ratings, which made it easier to identify patterns and themes.   Also, we filtered out companies with fewer than 30 ratings.


In terms of numerical data, we looked at…


  1. Feedback Volume:  # of interview feedback comments collected on the company.
  2. Interview Experience Rating:  did candidates rate it positive, negative or neutral?
  3. Interview Difficulty Rating:  did the candidates rate it hard, average or easy on a 5 point scale?


We also poured over the comments to uncover themes that correlated back to the ratings.


If you want to see how your company stacks up or if you want to compare yourself to the Fortune 1000 list, you can download a copy of the spreadsheet here and sort the data however you please.



The summaries below show some high level themes related to positive ratings, negative ratings and interview difficulty.




Average Percentage of Positive Ratings For All Companies = 62%


Companies With the Highest Percentage of Positive Ratings:
  1.  Moog (90%)
  2. Devon Energy (88%)
  3. Apache (86%)
  4. Scripps Networks Interactive (84%)
  5. Eastman (83%)


Companies With the Lowest Percentage of Negative Ratings:
  1.  Eastman (0%)* & O’Reilly Auto Parts (0%)
  2. Warner Music (2%)
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance (3%)
  4. CA Technologies (4%), Williams Energy (4%), Dow Chemical (4%)
  5. TOPS Markets (5%), Continental Airlines (5%), FirstEnergy (5%), Exxon Mobile (5%), Caterpillar (5%), Fleur (5%), JCrew (5%), Southern Company (5%), Devon Energy (5%)*


*These companies also appear on the Highest Percentage of Positive Ratings list (stronger positive indicator).


Want to see how your company compares?  View all results here.




Average Percentage of Negative Ratings For All Companies = 15.47%


Highest Percentage of Negative Ratings:


  1. ITT Corp (66%)*
  2. Torchmark (46%)*
  3. AmTrust Financial (40%)
  4. Verifone (39%)
  5. MSC Industrial Direct (38%)*


Lowest Percentage of Positive Ratings:


  1. ITT Corp (0%)
  2. Ryder System (18%)
  3. Super Micro Computer (27%)
  4. Church & Dwight (32%)
  5. Torchmark (37%)
  6. Netflix (37%)
  7. MSC Industrial (37%)


*These companies also appear in the Lowest % of Positive Ratings list (stronger negative indicator).


To see how your company compares, view all results here:


Overall Average Interview Difficulty = 2.68 out of 5.0


The 3 companies rated as having the most difficult interviews:


  1. Gartner (3.6)
  2. Stryker (3.5)
  3. Altria (3.4) & Proctor & Gamble (3.4)
The 3 companies rated as having the least difficult interviews:*


  1. Ingles Markets (1.3)
  2. TOPS Markets (1.5)
  3. Domino’s (1.6)


*There was a clear indication that retail, restaurant and supermarket chains had the least difficult interview ratings.  There was less of an industry correlation for the most difficult interview ratings.





Top 5 themes for the lowest rated companies:


 COMMUNICATION:  I never heard back from the company about my status.  I was told I would be moving to the next step, but it never happened.
–  TIMING:  I was told that I would hear back within a certain time frame, but it was not accurate.
–  CANDIDATE EXPERIENCE:  Interviewers were rude. Process was impersonal. Intimidation tactics used. Outdated interview questions.
–  INTERVIEWER QUALITY:  Interviewers were not on the same page about the requirements of the role.  Interviewers not engaged.
 PROCESS: There were too many rounds of interviews with too many people over too long a period of time.


Top 5 themes for the highest rated companies:
–  INTERVIEWER QUALITY:  Interviewers were engaged, open and honest about the demands of the job.
–  CANDIDATE EXPERIENCE:  Everyone was nice and took time to make me feel comfortable.
–  INTERVIEW COORDINATION:  The process was well organized.  They worked around my schedule.
–  INTERVIEW QUESTIONS:  Interviewers asked a variety of technical, experiential and behavioral questions.
–  COMMUNICATION:  They followed up with me quickly.  I was informed of my status in a timely fashion.




We thought about doing some further number crunching to find more correlations between different sets of data.


Perhaps certain industries naturally had higher difficulty scores.   Or perhaps companies that primarily hire University students naturally have a higher percentage of positive ratings.    Or maybe, companies in big cities have more negative ratings and more aggressive comments.


But then we realized…none of that really matters to the candidate!


Candidates don’t look at your low ratings on Glassdoor and say to themselves, “You know, that rating is probably correlated with the level of the job title and on par with the industry average.”


All they see are the raw numbers.   And they make their decision to apply (or not to apply) based on those numbers.


Finding and publishing correlations that soften the harsh ratings might help some Talent Acquisition leaders tell themselves a better story about why they have low scores, but at the end of the day…


candidates are only looking at the vanity metrics, so we need to deal with those head-on.




Knowing that candidates don’t care about what drives your ratings leads to a very simple call to action for companies with below average ratings…


If you don’t like your ratings, do something to improve your interview process.


Audit your experience, train your hiring teams, start using interview guides, get back to your candidates in a timely fashion, respond to comments on Glassdoor, etc., etc..


While Glassdoor metrics won’t make or break your employment brand, the data is relevant and should not be ignored.    I believe as many as 40% of candidates today are checking you out during the hiring process.


Glassdoor has an entire data division who has done some excellent in-depth research on this topic with greater access to data.  If you’d like to see more, you can find it here.


And if you’d like to download this article as a PDF along with the full spreadsheet of interview data, click here.

562 thoughts on “The Best (And Worst) Rated Interview Process According to Glassdoor ”

  1. Pingback: Google
  2. Pingback: Google
  3. Pingback: best anal toys
  4. Pingback: Store
  5. Pingback: fun88
  6. Pingback: 188bet
  7. Pingback: rijpe vrouw
  8. Pingback: webcam sex
  9. Pingback: pc games download
  10. Pingback: sexy gatas na web
  11. Pingback: rencontres adulte
  12. Pingback: thruster rabbit
  13. Pingback: anal sex kit
  14. Pingback: free app for pc
  15. Pingback: vibrating bullet
  16. Pingback: Times of India
  17. Pingback: cursos gratuitos
  18. Pingback: daniels sex toy
  19. Pingback: silicone penis toy
  20. Pingback: cordless massager
  21. Pingback: rampant rabbit
  22. Pingback: webcambabes
  23. Pingback: how to use stroker
  24. Pingback: silicone dildo
  25. Pingback: thrusting massager
  26. Pingback: real cock
  27. Pingback: brother sc6600
  28. Pingback: anal vibrator
  29. Pingback: massive dildo
  30. Pingback: pegging toys
  31. Pingback: realistic stroker
  32. Pingback: double sided dong
  33. Pingback: vibrator for her
  34. Pingback: anal bag spray
  35. Pingback: Porn Land
  36. Pingback: Tadapox
  37. Pingback: push ads review
  38. Pingback: huge dildo
  39. Pingback: glands ring
  40. Pingback: best ben wa balls
  41. Pingback: splorch review
  42. Pingback: using ben wa balls
  43. Pingback: vibrating panty
  44. Pingback: Drostanolone
  45. Pingback: remote control egg
  46. Pingback: best male stroker
  47. Pingback: dildo
  48. Pingback: big dildo
  49. Pingback: g gasm rabbit
  50. Pingback: treatment vagina
  51. Pingback: anal sex for gays
  52. Pingback: bdsm sex toys
  53. Pingback: porn
  54. Pingback: pornland
  55. Pingback: silicone vibrator
  56. Pingback: briefs
  57. Pingback: cyberskin sex toy
  58. Pingback: best male stroker
  59. Pingback: parliament
  60. Pingback: bunny vibrator
  61. Pingback: real feel dildo
  62. Pingback: sex toys haul
  63. Pingback: bullet massager
  64. Pingback: spanking paddle
  65. Pingback: bondage kit
  66. Pingback: porn
  67. Pingback: big dildo
  68. Pingback: Women's Lingerie
  69. Pingback: minoxidil 15%
  70. Pingback: viagra
  71. Pingback: stor hundeseng
  72. Pingback: continued
  73. Pingback: bdjobs apps
  74. Pingback: Fashion Station
  75. Pingback: Google
  76. Pingback: sexboer
  77. Pingback: porno files
  78. Pingback: geile sex filmpjes
  79. Pingback: gratis films
  80. Pingback: iptv xtream apk
  81. Pingback:
  82. Pingback: neon 7 inch dildo
  83. Pingback: cock pump
  84. Pingback: hundekurv flet
  85. Pingback: beeg bbw
  86. Pingback:
  87. Pingback: boite outlook
  88. Pingback: bdsm
  89. Pingback: sex restraints
  90. Pingback: costco hours
  91. Pingback: top 5 sex toys
  92. Pingback: podcast
  93. Pingback: finger vibrator
  94. Pingback: qq poker
  95. Pingback: domino online qq
  96. Pingback: vibrator
  97. Pingback: blowjob tips
  98. Pingback: glans ring
  99. Pingback: tax free
  100. Pingback: home decor tile
  101. Pingback: sbobet indonesia
  102. Pingback: troll
  103. Pingback: AOL Mail Login
  104. Pingback: Yahoomail
  105. Pingback: porn free
  106. Pingback: jockstrap thong
  107. Pingback: pocket pussy
  108. Pingback: FC Copenhagen
  109. Pingback: pleasure ring
  110. Pingback: doc johnson
  111. Pingback: mide 675
  112. Pingback: xxx
  113. Pingback: gay male toys
  114. Pingback: Yt Mp3
  115. Pingback: security
  116. Pingback: olamide
  117. Pingback: outdoor shutters
  118. Pingback: hotmail email
  119. Pingback: ssni 546
  120. Pingback: PPPD-780
  121. Pingback: cheap follower
  122. Pingback: Ghana Politics
  123. Pingback: best sex toys
  124. Pingback: big dildos
  125. Pingback: what is a douche
  126. Pingback: fset 842
  127. Pingback: login
  128. Pingback: Virtual Card buy
  129. Pingback: money exchanger
  130. Pingback: CAWD-008
  131. Pingback: first time dildo
  132. Pingback: fashion jockstraps
  133. Pingback: how to guitar solo
  134. Pingback: mario cartridges
  135. Pingback: Boston Car Service
  136. Pingback: Eweka
  137. Pingback: paypal card
  138. Pingback: walmartone login
  139. Pingback: THC vape juice
  140. Pingback: lose weight sleep
  141. Pingback: Tramadol Sale
  142. Pingback: Roulette System
  143. Pingback: ABP-898
  144. Pingback: runelite
  145. Pingback: MEYD 532
  146. Pingback: Artsy t shirts
  147. Pingback:
  148. Pingback: basketball
  149. Pingback: p spot
  150. Pingback: Ioe business
  151. Pingback: buy temazepam
  152. Pingback: ADP iPay
  153. Pingback: best jockstrap
  154. Pingback: gay male sex toys
  155. Pingback: gay lubricant
  156. Pingback: IPX 366
  157. Pingback: Agen Judi Slot
  158. Pingback: one walmart login
  159. Pingback: gay bum cleaning
  160. Pingback: prostate vibrator
  161. Pingback: SEO Vancouver
  162. Pingback: PPPD-788
  163. Pingback: sex toys
  164. Pingback: Malad Escorts
  165. Pingback: HUNTA-651
  166. Pingback: anal sex trainer
  167. Pingback: hollow strap on
  168. Pingback: Webinars
  169. Pingback: milfgilf xxx
  170. Pingback: crazybulk estafa
  171. Pingback: CAWD-010
  172. Pingback: OYC-278
  173. Pingback: sewa led
  174. Pingback: Lamelo ball
  175. Pingback: افلام نيك
  176. Pingback: nipple suckers
  177. Pingback: dildo
  178. Pingback: sneaker
  179. Pingback: کس تنگ
  180. Pingback: mywegmansconnect
  181. Pingback: PARCEL USA
  182. Pingback: g spot
  183. Pingback: web developer
  184. Pingback: income investing
  185. Pingback: EKDV 600
  186. Pingback: MIAA-161
  187. Pingback: buy vape online
  188. Pingback: Vape near me
  189. Pingback: Teofila Yetman
  190. Pingback: flexispy erfahrung
  191. Pingback: mspy erfahrungen
  192. Pingback: DOCP-175
  193. Pingback: ATID 370
  194. Pingback: liteblue usps gov
  195. Pingback: glans ring
  196. Pingback: best penis ring
  197. Pingback: double ended dildo
  198. Pingback: buy ambien online
  199. Pingback: watch repair
  200. Pingback: Demand 5
  201. Pingback: buy dianabol
  202. Pingback: free apk download
  203. Pingback: Russian smm panel
  204. Pingback: anal vibrators
  205. Pingback: Moving Pet
  206. Pingback: Buy marijuana
  207. Pingback: residential sale
  208. Pingback: strapon
  209. Pingback: anal balls
  210. Pingback: Century Sankya
  211. Pingback: glass anal dildo
  212. Pingback: buy viagra
  213. Pingback: viagra
  214. Pingback: propidren
  215. Pingback: cheap weed bc
  216. Pingback: realistic dildo
  217. Pingback: massage wand
  218. Pingback: remote vibrators
  219. Pingback: pc app
  220. Pingback: app apk for laptop
  221. Pingback: viagra
  222. Pingback: cbd oil for sale
  223. Pingback: cbd for sale
  224. Pingback: cialis
  225. Pingback:
  226. Pingback: vibrator sex toy
  227. Pingback: adam and eve dildo
  228. Pingback: Vidalista 20mg
  229. Pingback: cheap smm panel
  230. Pingback: Anti acne cream
  231. Pingback: silicone wand
  232. Pingback: bondage sex
  233. Pingback: p spot stimulation
  234. Pingback: buying a vibrator
  235. Pingback: Chiang Mai
  236. Pingback: viagra
  237. Pingback: viagra
  238. Pingback: viagra
  239. Pingback: viagra
  240. Pingback: viagra
  241. Pingback: viagra
  242. Pingback: viagra
  243. Pingback: viagra
  244. Pingback: viagra
  245. Pingback: viagra 2019
  246. Pingback: free robux
  247. Pingback: hoblist
  248. Pingback: naked
  249. Pingback: spins
  250. Pingback: free v bucks
  251. Pingback: VIAGRA
  252. Pingback: FREE V BUCKS
  253. Pingback: anal sex kit
  254. Pingback: cozaar
  255. Pingback: RSonline
  256. Pingback: realistic dildo
  257. Pingback: vibrating undies
  258. Pingback: vbuck
  259. Pingback: FUCK
  260. Pingback: free robux
  261. Pingback: phishing website
  262. Pingback: Porn
  263. Pingback: x-rated
  264. Pingback: Top Media Markt
  265. Pingback: xxx
  266. Pingback: nude
  267. Pingback: casual encounters
  268. Pingback: penis extender
  269. Pingback: pocket stroker
  270. Pingback: cozaar
  271. Pingback: dildo
  272. Pingback: butt plug review
  273. Pingback: dildo
  274. Pingback: 먹튀검증
  275. Pingback: 먹튀 검증
  276. Pingback: 토토메이저
  277. Pingback: 메이저놀이터
  278. Pingback: 먹튀폴리스
  279. Pingback: SEX
  280. Pingback: roblox free robux
  281. Pingback: escort directory
  282. Pingback: regulation
  283. Pingback: cozaar
  284. Pingback: kinky
  285. Pingback: regulations
  286. Pingback: Vacate Cleaner
  287. Pingback: cbd
  288. Pingback: buy cbd oil
  289. Pingback: pleasure bullet
  290. Pingback: hot anal toys
  291. Pingback: dildo close up
  292. Pingback: viagra online
  293. Pingback: x-rated
  294. Pingback: PORN DOWNLOAD

Comments are closed.